Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cynthia Phillips's avatar

In the olden days, you weren't supposed to present a law for enactment without first identifying a problem which only government could rectify and then stating the general policy behind the law was to rectify this problem.

So, I'm imagining the "whereas" clause of the Free Roadkill Law. "Whereas, Texans have been prevented from exercising their fundamental right to free meat caused by collisions on roadways and there has been a public outcry about this outrage, be it enacted....Therefore it is the policy of the Free Roadkill Act to allow any Texas citizen with first dibs on a dead animal on state roads to take it home and prepare it for consumption as they see fit.

I don't think it is actually against the law now to remove and eat roadkill. Of course, we must anticipate the Buzzard Lobby opposing this law. Come to think about it, buzzards should be protected too. We should not be removing their main source of food.

Gregory Pulte's avatar

What is the point of the notary ban?

6 more comments...

Ready for more?